You've read my opinions but unless you've talked to me you've never them in heard my voice. Now, thanks to Salon's Chauncey Dega you can in his podcast. By Hal M. Brown,

 

Chauncey DeVega is a senior politics writer for Salon. (You can read about Salon on Wikipedia.) His essays can also be found at Chaunceydevega.com. He also hosts two weekly podcasts, The Chauncey DeVega Show and The Truth Report. Chauncey can be followed on Twitter.

I've been quoted in three of Chauncey DeVega's columns 

You can listen to his podcasts at The Chauncey DeVega Show. I recorded a podcast with him a few days ago. This is his most recent podcast can easily be heard in here on Libsyn and as an Apple iTunes podcast. (It's listed as being on Stitcher but this link goes to Pandora and I can't find it on their list.)

Chauncey humbles me by noting that on this pre-election podcast he could have had some "heavy hitters" like well known historians and others who most people have heard of on the podcast. Indeed he could have. A recent podcast was with psychoanalyst and author Justin Frank (Wiki). On Oct. 23rd he talked to M. Steven Fish (Wiki profile), a professor of political science at the University of California, Berkeley. His new book is Comeback: Routing Trumpism, Reclaiming the Nation, and Restoring Democracy's Edge. He's interviewed Noble Prize winning economist Robert Reich and MSNBC's Joy Ann Reid.

His podcast interview today begins after a long impassioned monologue where he sings part of Mister Roger's "It's a Wonderful Day in the Neighborhood" two times and talks about his mother and the actual Chicago neighborhood where he lives.

Read a very brief summary of the two hour  interview here.

You'll have to scroll through to the end of this podcast when he concludes his talk with Eddie Kingston to hear his unedited 40 minute talk with me. 

My conversation begins at 1:40:

After his monologue he talks with a well known professional wrestler named Eddie Kingston:

This is from the podcast website:

Eddie Kingston (see Wikipedia profile) is an American professional wrestler currently signed with AEW (All Elite Wrestling). Kingston is a twenty-year veteran who has wrestled for and held championships in leading promotions all around the world including New Japan Pro-Wrestling (NJPW) and Ring of Honor (ROH).

Eddie Kingston reflects on his life journey and decision to be open and vulnerable about his struggles to be a more mentally and emotionally healthy man as shown by his widely-read and viewed essays, social media posts, and videos in support of mental health and suicide prevention.

After that you can hear our conversation where we talked mostly about mental health rather than politics. He describes this as me reflecting on my four decades of experience as a clinician and sharing some advice and insights about managing our emotions, trying to be healthy, and doing the things that make us happy as a way of fighting back against despair and surrender when our society (and personal lives) often feel so dark and dire.

I can't find a way to post a link to Chauncey's interview just with me. If you want to hear it you have to go to the last 40 minutes after he concludes his talk with Eddie Kingston.

 You can read an automatically generated transcript of it. Here's how it begins:

“Next segment, the one, the only Hal Brown here on The Chauncey DeVega Show. Brother Hal Brown, we have been emailing for years, and we got two weeks left, and I said, you and I finally got to talk, but I just wanted to hear your voice and to tell you thank you for all that you've been doing all these years, regardless what may happen, because this is going to be a long fight no matter what happens in two weeks. I just want to thank you.

You're very welcome, and I am humbled that I could help. In this way, what can I do? I was a therapist for 40 years, it's hard to believe.

I'm like the old man here, and it's like I see people like us, we're just struggling with our emotions, with our fears, trying to think, okay, if things go really well, you know what I think is, what the hell am I going to do with my time if things go really well? I was (inaudible) Donald Trump, just 2017, and now with what are we? Am I good enough to write a science fiction short story?”

The automatic transcription above and below isn't entirely accurate. 

Click above to enlarge image.

 

Addendum:

I could only find one recent photo of Chauncey. His Twitter page has a photo of Redd Fox as Sanford from Sanford and Sons. I forgot to ask him what the top photo meant or where it was from.

When I talked to Chauncy I was on my way to a dinner engagement where my partner Ann and another couple were waiting for me. I was 40 minutes late but they were all forgiving when I explained that I was caught up in the podcast which had a technical glitch in the middle where we had to pause for 10 minutes. I mentioned as an aside to Chauncey at the end of our conversation that at the continuing care retirement community where we live residents often wear simple name tags but I make my own which are more elaborate (see bottom of page for example). I told him that the one I made most recently reflects how I currently feel. You'll recognize the man from Evard Munch's "The Scream."

I designed a new one and ordered it from Zazzle which I hope to wear when Kamala wins. It is due to arrive on Nov. 7th. I don't want to jinx anything by previewing it here. If she wins I'll post it on a blog. Below is Dali's famous Perservence of Memory, or melting clocks, painting. My new name tag also has a Dali image.

Read previous blogs

Here are a few of the blogs I posted about Trump in 2016, By Hal M. Brown, MSW

I didn't have time to write a new blog so am posting these from June of 2016. I haven't edited it. Looking back at the Trump of 2016 he seems almost quaint becuse he has morphed into a monster. The illustration is new. It was made by using Perchance Image AI.

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

Hillary’s terrorism creds: you got them, use them.

Comments on Daily Kos

With pundits and pollsters asking whether in view of the Orlando attacks voters will be asking themselves which candidate will most effectively handle terrorism, it’s good to remind us that only one has a track record of actually doing something to fight terrorism.

However, Hillary is, after all a woman and we know how Donald Trump feels about women. Heather “Digby” Parton wonders whether her being a woman could work against her:  

And secondly, a woman was likely running for president for the first time and despite everyone’s assumption that she is some kind of bloodthirsty Boudica (the Celtic war queen who slaughtered a Roman army), the fact is that there were some good reasons to worry  that Americans would turn to the traditional party and the traditional (male) candidate if national security came front and center. It was entirely predictable that the Republicans  would play “the man card” if they could  find an opening.  Salon

While we don’t know what else she did as Secretary of State addressing terrorism (likely a lot), we do know that she was closely involved with the attack that took out Osama binLaden.

We've seen the photo of Obama, Biden, and Clinton in the situation room with top members of the national security team is known worldwide.

 I enlarged Hillary to make a point:

• She is the only one in the room sitting with stacks of information in front of her and on her lap, including the photo that had to be blurred out because it was top secret.

I expect that the powerful photo will be used in Hillary’s campaign ads. I think it would be effective to start with the full photo and zoom to this close-up of Hillary.

My advice to her on her anti-terrorism credentials: “Hill, you got them, use them.”

Tuesday, June 14, 2016

Breaking News:

Russian government hackers penetrated Democratic National Committee’s database and stole research on Donald Trump, according to a report published by the Washington Post.

DNC officials and security experts say the hackers were able to read all e-mail and chats in the DNC system.

Some of the hackers had been in the DNC system for a year, the Washington Post reports. They were expelled from the computer system this past weekend.

Russian spies also targeted the computers of Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton and several GOP political action committees. Further details of those attacks were not immediately available.

The NRA is doing a Trump, counter-punching with wild, stupid claims. Whether or not banning assault-rifles will absolutely prevent such shootings is irrelevent. If such a ban prevents one in the future since there's no sensible reason NOT to ban them, they should be banned. They are a dangerous "toy" for anyone not in the military or law enforcement.

Now then, to talk about dangerous, here's what's more dangerous that keeping the sale of these killing machines legal. It is promulgating the politically expedient idea that the Obama adminstration isn't doing enough to stop ISIS inspired terrorism. This does nothing but inspire fear and unwarranted anger at our government. Homeland Security along with its international partners is doing all that is feasible to prevent such terror acts. To say otherwise is denying what we know about the apparatus that has grown exponentially since 9-11. 

You better believe those who know how many attacks have been prevented, and how many investigations are currently active, would LIKE to share this information. But anyone with a fully functioning brain SHOULD understand this.

Monday, June 13, 2016

Breaking News: Trump just delivered a speech read off a teleprompter so obviously written by someone else that it is pathetic. Nothing new except doubling down on immigration policy. He also lied saying Mateen was born in Afghanistan. Below: Quote without comment:

Ask yourself, who is really the friend of women and the LGBT community, Donald Trump with his actions, or Hillary Clinton with her words? Clinton wants to allow Radical Islamic terrorists to pour into our country—they enslave women, and murder gays.

Trump is now proving one of two things, which are really mutually exclusive. This is getting a lot of media attention:

Donald Trump Suggests Obama May Be Sympathetic To Islamic Terrorism

“[Obama] doesn’t get it, or he gets it better than anybody understands,” Trump said.

I’m writing this now and getting it posted while everything is fresh. I know I should write a  really well-researched diary on this. I keep hoping an expert with real bona fides — i.e. having published books and academic papers on psychiatric diagnosis — will do the work for me. I’m just a clinical social worker psychotherapist who was a mental health center director. I’ve made some tough diagnoses that other therapists missed but compared to Trump they were easy. This wouldn’t be like writing my typical blog which is a morning 1-2 hour exercise since it is just opinion. It would be more like work! I’d actually have to do a lot of research.

It won’t matter to Trump when we learn, as I think we will, that Omar Mateen was motivated primarily or exclusively by homophobia. He will keep insisting that he was a radical Islamist and that his murder spree was ISIS terrorism. His supporters of course will believe him. The hell with evidence! Not only is this the most horrible mass shooting in the United States, but it is many times over the worst LGBT hate crime ever. To ignore that for political purposes is a punch in the face to all LGBT people. 

If Trump is just stoking the fears of anti-Obama conspiracy theorists (and not mentally ill) then he has stooped possibly to his lowest low since his birther claims. If he actually believes this, we have to add yet another psychiatric diagnosis to those which he has demonstrated symptoms of. So add another diagnosis to narcissistic personality disorder, anti-social personality disorder, and impulse control disorder. I’ve highlighted the symptoms of paranoid personality disorder that apply to Trump.

Paranoid personality disorder (PPD) is a mental disorder characterized by paranoia and a pervasive, long-standing suspiciousness and generalized mistrust of others. Individuals with this personality disorder may be hypersensitive, easily insulted, and habitually relate to the world by vigilant scanning of the environment for clues or suggestions that may validate their fears or biases. Paranoid individuals are eager observers. They think they are in danger and look for signs and threats of that danger, potentially not appreciating other evidence.[1]

They tend to be guarded and suspicious and have quite constricted emotional lives. Their reduced capacity for meaningful emotional involvement and the general pattern of isolated withdrawal often lend a quality of schizoid isolation to their life experience.[2][verification needed]People with PPD may have a tendency to bear grudges, suspiciousness, tendency to interpret others' actions as hostile, persistent tendency to self-reference, or a tenacious sense of personal right.[3] Patients with this disorder can also have significant comorbidity with other personality disorders. Wikipedia

Most of my therapist friends and acquaintances have chosen to work with patients who are highly motivated to get better, and for whom there is a high chance of success. Even those who treat the chronically mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or with substance abuse problems (and part of my program had a unit where we did that) we know that with smart, compassionate treatment the lives of these people can be drastically improved. 

The bane of therapists are patients or clients who have personality disorders. It is the exception rather than the rule that they come into therapy on their own. This is because most people with personality disorders lack insight into themselves. They don’t generally think they have a problem.  They tend to come in because their spouse has issued an ultimatum or they are court ordered. 

Trump would be a nightmare client. I assume there would be a psychotherapist somewhere who would agree to treat him for enough money. I’m not rich, and it would be nice to buy that Tesla,* but no amount of money would induce me to treat him.

* (Updated today, there's no way I would enrich Elon Musk by buying a Tesa.)

A new way to describe Trump: he's a dangerous, despotic, and demented demagogue, by Hal M. Brown, MSW

I am keeping my Washington Post subscription despite the outrage I share with the some 200,000 people who canceled their subscriptions in protest of what owner Jeff Bezos did. While I can read news articles elsewhere, in The New York Times for example, I can't read the Post opinions without a subscription. 

Today in the opinion section two down from the top column of the page position (when I read it), which had the attempt by Bezos to justify his decision to not let the paper endorse a candidate, is a column by Eli Merritt, a research assistant professor in the Department of Political Science at Vanderbilt University, is the author of “Disunion Among Ourselves: The Perilous Politics of the American Revolution.”

This is how he begins his column Opinion: There’s a better term for Trump than ‘fascist’ as follows:

As we approach the culmination of Donald Trump’s third bid for the presidency, I continue to be struck by how bumbling most Americans are at properly naming a breed of politicians that has bedeviled democracies since the time of the ancient Greeks.

The latest example of this linguistic disorder is the designation of the ex-president as a “fascist” by John F. Kelly, former Marine general and former chief of staff to Trump, as well as by Vice President Kamala Harris a day later.

It is not wrong to identify fascist tendencies in Trump, such as ultranationalism, ethnocentrism, cronyism, persecution of internal enemies and comfort with violence. But these traits also qualify him for classification as a dictator, despot, autocrat and authoritarian.

So why single out “fascist,” an inflammatory charge conjuring images of 20th-century mass murderers?

A far better designation, one that sums up Trump with precision, is “demagogue.”

He concludes by adding yet another word, one even more chilling than demagogue: tyrant.

What we know with confidence is that the ex-president is a demagogue par excellence, and in light of the history of demagogues transforming into tyrants, it’s indisputably ill-advised to restore him to the presidency.

But such matters are not for professors of political science to decide. If Trump prevails in the election, the question of what kind of leader he is will be put to a high-stakes test. We shall see with our own eyes.

I've thought that the word "fascist" applied to Trump wasn't having as much of an effect as it ought to. This was not only because too many Americans didn't know it's precise meaning, which I think is true, but because it didn't have an ominous enough ring to it. It seemed to me to be a soft sounding word. It didn't evoke the horrors of Hitler the way the word Nazi does. 

I hadn't thought of the word "demagogue" until now. While its meaning may be more obscure than "fascist" and everyone knows what a dictator is, "demagogue" not only sounds ominous but it lends itself to alterations like "Trump is a dangerous, despotic, and demented, demagogue." 

Trump, who I and other therapists, have called a malignant narcissist could also be correctly called a "malignant demagogue." Malignant is one of the most frightening word in the English language when a doctor uses it about yourself and a loved one. Everyone knows that  malignant cells (like those shown below in the AI picture of Trump sitting in front of a portrait of his favorite person) can spread and kill someone. 

Trump uses his attack words to demonize his enemies like he's swinging a cudgel. He's been successful in spewing lies doused in rheotical gasoline designed to inflame and incite his audience. He did this on Jan. 6th and was successful.

The Democrats have not been able to do this with their words. You'd think that their wordsmiths run whatever descriptions they think of applying to Trump by Miss Manners, who at 86 is still writing advice, columns before using them.

In the same Washington Post edition Jennifer Rubin uses the term fascism in her column: "The U.S. can learn from other countries’ encounters with fascism."

She begins her column this way:

The mainstream media — spurred by the disturbing outpouring of racism at Donald Trump’s rally on Sunday at Madison Square Garden — has finally zeroed in on the stakes of this election: the preservation of our democracy against a fascist threat. (As historian Ruth Ben-Ghiat pointed out: “He knows that everyone watching and attending knows that he is reenacting a Nazi show.”)

As retired general and former White House chief of staff John F. Kelly confirmed for the New York Times, Trump certainly meets the definition of a fascist: “It’s a far-right authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy.” The public has begun to catch on. (ABC News reports that half the country views Trump as a fascist.)

In the last week before the election let's see if Kamala Harris and Tim Walz can begin to make the case that Trump is a demagogue aspiring to be a tyrant.

Bonus:

Here's Trump assuring us that he's not a Nazi.

Yesterday's blog 

Trump's garden party was a wicked carnival of grievances, misogyny and racism but also a preview of what the country would be if he's elected

Read previous blogs.

Trump's garden party was a wicked carnival of grievances, misogyny and racism but also a preview of what the country would be if he's elected, by Hal M. Brown, MSW

 

Colorized version

This is the coverage (from Google News) of the Trump rally. Click image to enlarge the titles just from the top of the page.

This is the first article, on the bottom left above) that I clicked on: 

I’m a U.S. Navy veteran. Here’s why I’m protesting Trump’s Madison Square Garden rally

Next to the photo I used to illustrate this blog he wrote:

In February 1939, over 20,000 Americans gathered at MSG to support Hitler in a shocking display intertwining American nationalism, swastikas, and images of George Washington. Hijacking Washington’s birthday, they advocated for a “white-only America” and included a Pledge of Allegiance, posters stating, “Stop Jewish Domination of Christian America,” uniformed stormtroopers, and speakers denouncing Jewish refugees and praising American racism like the anti-miscegenation laws, the Chinese Exclusion Act, and Jim Crow policies.

“It’s always been American to protect the Aryan character of this country,” declared one speaker, Gerhard Wilhelm Kunze.

Does any of this sound familiar? It should. Trump’s rhetoric echoes the same dangerous themes. He frames immigrants as invaders, journalists as enemies, and political opponents as existential threats to America’s future. This is the same playbook authoritarian leaders have used for centuries.

He wrote this prior to the rally. Not ony did everything the author, Ken Harbaugh, predicted would happen actually happened, it was worse than I would guess he thought it would be.

By now if you have been watching MSNBC's "Morning Joe" and watched some of the coverage last night, you have seen discussions about how the rally was replete with offensive and racist comments. 

The New York Times (which unlike The Washington Post and the LA Times) has endorsed a candidate) published this article (subsription): 

Here's how it begins:

Donald J. Trump’s closing rally at Madison Square Garden on the second to last Sunday before the election was a release of rage at a political and legal system that impeached, indicted and convicted him, a vivid and at times racist display of the dark energy animating the MAGA movement.

A comic kicked off the rally by dismissing Puerto Rico as a “floating island of garbage,” then mocked Hispanics as failing to use birth control, Jews as cheap and Palestinians as rock-throwers, and called out a Black man in the audience with a reference to watermelon.

Another speaker likened Vice President Kamala Harris to a prostitute with “pimp handlers.” A third called her “the Antichrist.” And the former Fox News host Tucker Carlson mocked Ms. Harris — the daughter of an Indian mother and a Jamaican father — with a made-up ethnicity, saying she was vying to become “the first Samoan-Malaysian, low IQ former California prosecutor ever to be elected president.”

By the time the former president himself took the stage, an event billed as delivering the closing message of his campaign, with nine days left in a tossup race, had instead become a carnival of grievances, misogyny and racism.

The article didn't go into what Trump actually said beyond this: "Mr. Trump took the stage two hours after scheduled — was often infused with more self-indulgence than political strategy. It was about what they called a closing carnival of grievances, misogyny and racism. I would add that it was a preview of what a Trump administration would look like. 

I have a feeling that when the Trump event was called a carnival the writers were thinking of Ray Bradbury's classic novel "Something Wicked This Way Comes" because it is about a wicked carnival with a menacing villian named Mr. Dark. Note the subtitle: The inflammatory rally was a capstone for an increasingly aggrieved campaign for Donald Trump, whose rhetoric has grown darker and more menacing. Mr. Dark is described in Wikipedia as follows:

 "Mr. Dark", who seemingly wields the power to grant the townspeople's secret desires. In reality, Dark is a malevolent being who, like the carnival, lives off the life force of those it enslaves. 

I could go on to draw a parallel with Trump and Mr. Dark, and the secret desires, though not so secret desires, of the people who are the townspeople who support him, but I am sure you can do this yourself. 

 Addendum: Here's an article that you may have missed.

This is what Kathleen Belew, an associate professor of history at Northwestern University, posted on X:

The point here is that fascism is on full display, openly: no dog whistles, no plausible deniability. It's a show of power and an another attempt to make this look and feel normal.And it will not just magically disappear after the election, regardless of the outcome. In fact, it might be worth thinking through the very likely possibility that this kind of display suggests that this candidate and this movement don't care that much about the outcome.

This is what Ruth Ben-Ghiat, historian and author of "Strongmen" posted on X in response to Aaron Rupar noting that almost every speaker at this rally has claimed that "they" tried to kill Trump.

The purpose of this is to conjure a threat environment sufficient to justify authoritarian action if they win. Old trick of those planning coups as well.

On Salon Heather "Digby" Parton wrote a column which includes some quotes I won't share becasue I want to keep this blog PG rated. 

Trump's Madison Square Garden scandal: Is it too late to undo the damage?

She concluded:

Is it just another tempest in a teapot? Could be. Trump is a master at eluding all accountability. He didn't say anything about it in his own speech but perhaps he'll address it today and that will be the end of it. But if there's a lesson from 2016 it's that a scandal that would normally blow over given enough time can be lethal in the final days of a campaign. In a tied race it's the last thing any campaign would want.

Of course, everything that was said in that rally should, by all rights, disqualify Trump in the minds of decent people everywhere. I'll never understand how any of that is considered normal political discourse now. But specifically insulting a group (Puerto Ricans) that's necessary for victory is just plain dumb even for them. All it takes is just a point or two in the right place and it could be the death blow.  

This is from HuffPost:

Just a note about how Madison Square Garden is being abbreviated as MSG. When I lived in New York we just called it "The Garden." Ricky Nelson sang Garden Party (see video). MSG most often stands for monosodium gulatamate, the flavor enhancer generally considered safe for your health. In this instance the rally at MSG is not safe for the health of democracy.

Read previous blogs.

Has Trump's crude phallocentric politics led to evangelicals abandoning him? By Hal M. Brown, MSW

Who would ever have thought that the size of Arnold Palmer's penis would come up in a presidential election? Most adults, even none golfers, know that Arnold Palmer was one of the world's greatest golfers and even know that a drink which is still popular was named for him.  It is shown above in the long glass which it is generally served in.

From here I make the leap into Trump and Jesus and then to Trump and phallic symbols:
 

Voters who saw nothing tawdry, let alone sacrilegious, about images of Trump and Jesus shown above and didn't find it off-putting that Trump would sell electonic trading cards like the decidely phallic one may be rethinking voting for him. Consider this article:

The article begins:

Donald Trump’s “Believers and Ballots Faith Town Hall” in Zebulon, Georgia, on Wednesday was very short on words about believers, ballots or faith. In the closing days of past campaigns, the Republican Party and its Christian right allies made strong appeals to these voters to get out to the polls in huge numbers to save “Christian” America and “biblical” values. On Wednesday, though, Trump’s perfunctory appearance at Christ Chapel Church in the battleground state punted on an opportunity to make such a plea inside a church. The abbreviated, uncomfortable charade showed how Trump, in his third presidential run, has dispensed with the GOP’s farcical claim to being the party of religious Americans, relying instead on his status as a messiah figure to mobilize his loyal base of white evangelical voters. 

One of the town hall participants asked Trump about a survey released earlier this month by the evangelical pollster George Barna and Arizona Christian University, claiming that 32 million regular churchgoers may not vote this November (this is not the first time Barna has made such dire pronouncements, including in 2016, when Trump won). Asked to “share a final message to those Christians to encourage them to go to the polls,” Trump could not even bring himself to offer such a message. He did not acknowledge or thank the voters who helped propel him to the White House eight years ago and stood by him throughout his scandalous presidency and insurrection. Instead, he said, “Christians are not tremendous voters,” and then rambled for nearly three minutes on themes of religious persecution by “not nice” and “stupid” people, guns and COVID restrictions, without completing coherent sentences or thoughts.

The article goes on to describe how Trump and his "embrace of a new evangelical leader, far-right campus troll and election denier Charlie Kirk may have worked against him." Kirk claimed Democrats “stand for everything God hates” and called the election “a spiritual battle.”

If these evangelical voters are paying attention at all they should be realizing that Trump is a sleazy lowlife liar who will pander for votes in any way that he can from courting the phallocentric (look it up here) "bros" who are fans of the Joe Rogan show to using language to attack his enemies that, if their kids used words like that, they'd be taken to task.

Read this from The States Newsroom:

The article, which I find an extraordinary example of how unprecedentedly bizarre this campaign has become, begins:

In all fairness, the latest installment of our phallocentric presidential politics began with Barack Obama’s taunt of Donald Trump’s fragile manhood at the Democratic National Convention last summer.

With one deft move, Obama combined a humorous observation about Trump’s preoccupation with the size of his rallies with hand gestures the raucous crowd interpreted as a reference to the former president’s brag about his penis size during the 2016 Republican primary.

In an exchange with then rival Sen. Marco Rubio, Trump denied that the size of his hands bespoke any sexual inadequacy on his part. “Look at those hands, are they small hands?” Trump said to a stunned, but thoroughly titillated nation watching the debate on television. “And he referred to my hands — ‘if they’re small, something else must be small.’ I guarantee you, there’s no problem. I guarantee.”

It was a puerile insult that a bigger man — and certainly every woman — would’ve ignored as too stupid and self-demeaning to engage, but not Trump. 

The GOP frontrunner was more than willing to become the first presidential candidate in history who was insecure enough to assure voters he possessed enough ‘big penis energy’ to lead America into whatever post-coital future it could imagine.

Pehraps the accusations coming from no fewer that 23 women about how Trump sexually assaulted them is starting to lead them to believe that there's no way all of them could be making this up. Maybe they are wondering about why Trump would want to hang out with Jeffrey Epstein.

I see the preening narcisstic (read yesterday's blog about that term) phallocentric Trump having his deepest insecurities being triggered by the fact that he is running against a self-confident and accomplished woman who also happens to be physically attractive, one who clearly doesn't see him as the hunk, the hunk of burning love he fancies himself to be.

Sorry Trump, you never were and never will be Elvis.

Yesterday's blog:

I just read an article blasting Trump for wearing more makeup than Kamala and was reminded about how Jennifer Senior first called him a preening narcissist.

Read all previous blogs.