September 7, 2024

Trump has a new apologist with linguist James McWhorter who says he has mastered 'the weave" speaking style, by Hal Brown, MSW

 



James McWhorter is a Columbia University linguist who explores how race and language shape our politics and culture. He just had this column published in The NY Times:


He begins his column this way:

Donald Trump’s word-salad oratory has always been a distinctive feature of his public life, leaving some observers to grasp for a novel way to describe it. Last week Trump himself gave it a name, one that sounds kind of like a ’70s dance: “the weave.”

“You know what the weave is?” he asked the crowd at a rally in Johnstown, Pa. “I’ll talk about like nine different things, and they all come back brilliantly together, and it’s like, friends of mine that are, like, English professors, they say, ‘It’s the most brilliant thing I’ve ever seen.’”

I wonder if somewhere in the recesses of his mind, one of those English professors is me.

The "friend" reference refers to this

During a rally in Johnstown, Pennsylvania, on August 30, Trump asserted that what the “Fake News” describes as rambling is actually a genius-level rhetorical device he calls “the weave.”

“You know, I do the weave,” Trump said. “You know what the weave is? I’ll talk about like nine different things, and they all come back brilliantly together, and it’s like, friends of mine that are, like, English professors, they say, ‘It’s the most brilliant thing I’ve ever seen.’”


This is far from the first time Trump has tried to deny or explain away allegations of incoherence. When he kept publicly mixing up the names Barack Obama and Joe Biden, he said we just don’t understand sarcasm. After a Wall Street Journal poll that found nearly half of respondents didn’t think Trump is mentally up to the presidency, he bragged about passing a dementia test years earlier, and challenged Rupert Murdoch and the paper’s editors to do the same. And in response to reports that he had a bizarre public post-DNC meltdown, Trump insisted in a Truth Social post that Fox News called him first (which wasn’t the issue) and that Maureen Dowd is “gilted” (whatever that means).

None of this really made any sense, but presumably these arguments, much like Trump’s meandering rally tirades, were crystal clear to his many English-professor friends. It’s lucky for Trump that academics who have no problem breaking down his Ulysses-esque political messaging make up such a huge portion of the American electorate!

 


This linguist suggests Trump's incoherent word salad is deliberate. I disagree.

I do not think Trump uses this speech pattern or style skillfully. I do not think it is deliberate. I don't even think this is a powerful tool with his cult. He may get laughs telling shark stories at rallies but I expect that many in the audience are completely lost when he says things like this.

Like other shrinks (for example Harry Segal and  Lance Dodes), I have done some writing about Trump (see Google search for some of my essays) having dementia and have concluded that there is a good chance that he is in the early stages. 


Donald Trump, on the other hand, has been speaking nonsense and spouting gibberish on the campaign trail and the media is covering for him by pretending that his verbal incontinence actually makes sense or by ignoring it altogether. Yes, there's been some mordant chuckling in the media over his bizarre comments about "the late great Hannibal Lecter" and his meandering tales about electric boats and shark attacks. Those stories are all delivered with a twinkling eye-roll as if to say "Oh that wacky Trump, there he goes again" as if it's just a funny little anecdote, apropos of nothing.

Read her entire article. She lays it out far better than I could.

There have been other recent articles about how the MSM, including the NY Times, is doing this. The authors of these article sometimes try to translate incoherent word salad into something that makes sense. I say they are adding dementia detergent to Trump's word salad stained speech and trying to wash it out. McWhorter, as a linguist, has no expertise in dementia. I think, whether he is doing this deliberately or not, he has become an apolgist for Trump. 

Note in this article McWhorter only mentions dementia once:

No friend of his am I (nor an English professor exactly — my field is Linguistics), but I wrote in 2018, in response to speculation even then that Trump was suffering some kind of dementia, that in listening to him we must realize that informal, occasionally jumbled speech is not automatically incoherent.
I think the crucial paragraph in the recent McWhorter article is:

However, the distinction between public and private speech is key here, so I am unconvinced that his current speech patterns can be analyzed as evidence of dementia. Instead, they’re characteristics of casual speech as it has always existed.

This is the only time dementia is referred to.

I have never heard anyone speak casually the way Trump does unless you count the seriously mentally ill patients who went off their medication in my old community mental health program

McWhorter seems to be saying that Trump uses "the weave" deliberately and skillfully. I certainly don't.  He begins with the 2015 example which could be a deliberate use of the weave but also a sign of early dementia:

Look, having nuclear — my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at M.I.T.; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of finance, very good, very smart — you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I’m one of the smartest people anywhere in the world — it’s true! — but when you’re a conservative Republican they try — oh, they do a number ….

In this example the elements are all related, albeit losely. Compare this to his recent bacon comment. None of the elements are related. 

You take a look at bacon and some of these products,” Trump said at a recent town hall in Wisconsin. “Some people don’t eat bacon anymore. And we are going to get the energy prices down. When we get energy down — you know, this was caused by their horrible energy — wind, they want wind all over the place. But when it doesn’t blow, we have a little problem.”

The most publicized comment about sharks and electrocution can most charitably be decribed as free association. This is a technique used in psychoanalysis to uncover unconconscious meanings.  In fact, if Trump was in traditional psychoanalysis this is what he'd be doing if he was asked to free associate to a dream about being on a sinking electric boat. 

If Trump doesn't have early dementia he may be suffering from mania which for him would be a good thing since there are medications to treat this.  

Addendum:

It isn't only the word salad that demonstrates that Trump has lost mental acuity. Consider how he says things that ultimately can be used to his detriment, for example what he said about E. Jean Carroll yesterday.


Read previous blog posts here.

September 6, 2024

If elected Trump will bring us the authoritarianism of "1984" with the brutal chaos of "The Lord of the Flies." By Hal Brown, MSW

 

Click image to enlarge (Trump caricatures created by Perchance Photo AI)

Rather than make this a treatise on the two novels and how there are elements in each which correspond with what Trump will usher in for the country if he becomes president again I will assume most readers know the themes of "1984" and "The Lord of the Flies." 

I admit that I got the idea for this blog from the AI images that came up when I was looking for illustrations for yesterday's blog about Trump's mosquito episode (here). 

I'll leave it to someone with literary chops to go into depth about how these and other dystopian novels (both of these books are on this list) could foreshadow what a Trump presidency could turn our great democratic experiment into. 

"Project 2025" isn't a novel. It is a "how to book."

 If Trump wins it could stand next to "Mein Kampf" as the most destructive instructional manual of all time.


Excerpt:

"Mein Kampf" was a clear-cut warning to the world of Hitler's intentions for war and genocide, which may have been recognized and prevented had more people read it outside of Germany, some historians say. Publishers in the United States and the U.K. did produce copies in English prior to the War, but were held up by copyright lawsuits by Hitler's publishers.



September 5, 2024

The Trump mosquito episode was less unhinged than his usual demented word salad, by Hal Brown, MSW

 

My AI generated image

Here's what Trump said durinng what was billed as a Fox News town hall:

“But we did a good debate, we had a good debate and it was a fair debate. And he was down like 18 or 19 points after the debate.” 

This was before before he swatted the air around his head. He continued: 

“I hate mosquitoes, I’m surprised. I didn’t think we had — we don’t like those mosquitoes, running around. We want nothing to do with them. But — and we want nothing to do with bad politicians that hate our country too if you wanna know the truth.” (From HUFFPOST article Donald Trump’s Biden Rant Gets Totally Derailed By Surprise Guest On Fox News)

 

You can watch Trump's reaction to a mosquito flying near his face here.




I've been writing about how Trump speaks in disconnected words and how this is indicative of dementia, but actually his jumping from talking about how he hates mosquitos and wanting nothing to do with them to wanting nothing to do with bad politicians actually made sense, at least to a point. He would have been more precise if instead of saying "they hate our country, too" because it gives these insects human characteristics, he should have said they are annoying, useless, and can be dangerous."

Nobody likes mosquitos. They are always annoying. In some parts of the country there is reason to fear them since some of them carry Eastern equine encephalitis (EEE)

Instead of abruptly shifting the topic to, say, how windmills kill birds, he made a somewhat logical connection to bad politicians. 

Trump could have done better in his equating mosquitos with bad politicians. Once upon a time when he had a semblance of mental acuity he might have described how his political enemies had the characteristics of mosquitos. After all they are annoying, can bite you, cause itchy rashes, suck your blood, and they can carry serious diseases (reference). 


Even so, his jumping from having a mosquito flying in his face to bad politicans wasn't as demented as the rants I wrote about a couple of days ago here.


This bug bugging Trump did him a favor since the incident gave him a line that prompted his audience to cheer him.





September 4, 2024

Trump posts weird image with rant against gag order in "greatest political witch hunt" by Hal Brown, MSW

 


I saw this Trump Truth Social post in this article 

'I am proud to represent our failing nation': Trump melts down in early morning court rant

This is what he wrote:

I am proud to represent our Failing Nation in fighting the GREATEST POLITICAL WITCH HUNT IN HISTORY. REMOVE THE GAG ORDER SO THAT I CAN SHOW HOW CORRUPT OUR COURT SYSTEM IS. PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES ARE NOT TO BE GAGGED!


More than the words which are typical of Trump, I was struck by the image. I wondered where the image Trump decided to use came from.

I couldn't find out who created the image and have no idea how Trump came across it but it has been online at least since 2020:


Obviously Trump found it and thought the image conveyed something he wanted to get across. 

I suppose he thought his flag hugging and flag kissing photos had been overused or didn't have the glowing menacing look on his face which he wanted people to see.


The flag face reminded me of spectators at football games who paint their faces, and sometimes with men, their chests, with team logos. Some like Jamie Pagliei are locally famous for this (read article).


There are always people at Trump rallies who paint their faces, or in at least one instance at the RNC Conventon, the back of their heads. The blonde woman shown twice below has been photographed at several rallies. 



He didn't object to it being used to beat police officers.

But when Trump defaces the flag by putting it on his face this is fine.

Of course Trump didn't literally use paint or makeup on his face. Someone used a more advanced AI than the free one from Perchance Photo AI (below) which I have to superimpose the Stars and Stripes on his face. 


Trump, in his warped narcisstic mind, thinks showing the stars and stripes on his face conveys patriotism.

What kind of person does this? (That's a rhetorical question.)

I suppose one can be grateful that at least he didn't use a computer generated image of himself as Captain America like the one I just made.
Here's a more accurate one:





Most recent blogs:

I can joke that Trump thinks that wind turbines kill both bacon and birds, but his dementia is not a laughing matter, by Hal Brown, MSW

Trump said the following (also shown above) in a Potterville, Michigan speech where he began talking about Kamala Harris and San Francisco. It is impossible to figure out what was going on in his mind from where he went from there considering that he ended up talking about Lincoln and about getting shot himself and not knowing where the bullet came form.
She destroyed the city of San Francisco, it’s — and I own a big building there — it’s no — I shouldn’t talk about this but that’s OK I don’t give a damn because this is what I’m doing. I should say it’s the finest city in the world — sell and get the hell out of there, right? But I can’t do that. I don’t care, you know? I lost billions of dollars, billions of dollars. You know, somebody said, ‘What do you think you lost?’ I said, ‘Probably two, three billion. That’s OK, I don’t care.’ They say, ‘You think you’d do it again?’ And that’s the least of it. Nobody. They always say, I don’t know if you know. Lincoln was horribly treated. Uh, Jefferson was pretty horribly. Andrew Jackson they say was the worst of all, that he was treated worse than any other president. I said, ‘Do that study again, because I think there’s nobody close to Trump.’ I even got shot! And who the hell knows where that came from, right?
Perhaps somewhere in his addled brain he thinks he was shot by John Wilkes Booth, who was at least a colorful character, and not the mentally ill nobody Thomas Mathew Crooks.Questions surrounding Trump’s mental acuity are a real 2024 storyHis speech is becoming harder and harder to understand.

Trump wants to look like a muscle bound superman and a regular caring compassionate human being. Can he sell himself as having two faces? By Hal Brown, MSW

Can Trump sell himself as having two faces? You can click my AI images to enlarge them. The image above really didn’t convey Trump as particularly compassionate and caring. Here’s what I got when I asked my free Perchance Photo AI for happy Trump playing with little children. Apparently even AI couldn’t make him look […]

There are worse things in Project 2025, but the elimination of the National Weather Service and NOAA shouldn’t be ignored. By Hal Brown, MSW

The article (above) begins as follows: Among its many sweeping calls for change in American government, a conservative platform document known as Project 2025 urges the demolition of some of the nation’s most dependable resources for tracking weather, combating climate change and protecting the public from environmental hazards. “Break up NOAA,” the document says, referring to the National Oceanic […]

Did Trump follow the procedure to have a formal wreath laying ceremony complete with military escorts at Arlington? You be the judge. By Hal Brown, MSW

Because Trump is now an ordinary citizen in the controversial ceremony at Arlington there’s one question that I haven’t seen asked. Trump was escorted by two members of the 101st Airborne. A military bugler was also part of the ceremony. Federal law prohibits Army employees from being involved with any political campaign. There’s a procedure […]




MORONS." as - GREG HEFFLEY

Trump has a new apologist with linguist James McWhorter who says he has mastered 'the weave" speaking style, by Hal Brown, MSW

  James McWhorter is a  Columbia University linguist who explores how race and language shape our politics and culture. He just had this col...