January 19, 2025

Vomitaurguarion Day will challenge half the country to find something else to do, by Hal M. Brown

 


What is happening in Israel may bump some of the coverage of tomorrow's inauguration off non-stop TV coverage. Even if it does, somewhere around the half of the country who might be inclined to watch at least the high point of any inauguration would find watching Trump sworn in too upsetting. 

The actual hand on the Bible with Trump uttering a tissue of lies when he takes the oath is so historic that only a 9.6 Richtor Scale earthquake just off the California coast would force the networks to cut away. 


That is with the possible exception of Fox News. They probably don't think that the biggest natural disaster since the Chicxulub impactor, the plummeting asteroid or comet that is said to have killed all the dinosaurs and 75% of life on earth, destroying California is a tragedy. 

Trump's entertainment line-up certainly won't draw viewership in the evening the way the star-studded cast Kamala Harris would have had would. 

Our plan is to treat Monday as a mostly normal day. As far as TV watching goes we'll watch some of the comedy series Younger alternating with a crime series we've yet to decide on after just finishing watching Dalgliesh. I expect we'll check in periodically with the commentary being offered online by The Contratian. This is the new substack started by Jennifer Rubin and Norm Eisen which is off to an amazing start.

The inauguration, for so many of us, will be like what I depicted in the AI cartoon illustration of Trump surrounded by vomit. Watching it might lead us to our own medicine cabinet to find some Pepto Bismal.


  ----------------------------------------


January 18, 2025

Hegseth is wrong, There is no thin line between legality and lethality. By Hal M. Brown



The titles of the same Sabrina Haake essay about Pete Hegseth have a different emphasis. RawStory's title emphasized his lack of qualifications. On her substack, The Haake Take, the author focuses on his view about when it is permissible to use lethal force even if it might not be legal.

Hegseth may not be the least qualified Trump nominee. I'd give that "honor" to the just defeated one term member of the House, Lori Chavez-DeRemer, who has been nominated to be Sectretary of Labor. She was mayor of Happy Valley, a city in the Portland suburbs with a population of about 26,000. Critics said this was an example of someone falling upwards in their career.

Hegseth was a reserve Army major. Army majors usually serve as specalized executive or operations officers for battallion-sized units of 300 to 1,200 soldiers. His being promoted to someone with authority over generals is a  far bigger example of falling upwards than Chavez-  DeReemer.

I point this out because RawStory published this with the title "The least qualified Trump Cabinet pick ever." They should have used the HaakeTake title, "Hegseth's thin line between lethality and legality." Sabrina Haake's title in HaakeTake was "Hegseth's thin line between lethality and legality." Heseth is unqualified, but  what is important is that he is a danger to democracy. He wants to turn the miliary into a version of the SS.

Hegseth said he “thought very deeply about the balance between legality and lethality,” and that when it comes to “destroying the enemy,” i.e., killing people, the law “should not be getting in the way” should have led to Democrats and any Republicans with integrity on the committee saying "well, this hearing is over and walking out.

There is no thin line between legality and lethality in the military. Adding the word "line" to the two words make a nice alliteration. However, only with Hegseth and other itchy trigger fingered soldiers like him, some of whom have been convicted of war crimes, is that this line is thin to the point of being nonexistent. The military addressed the "line" in overseas combat when it comes to deliberately killing civilians. When it comes to targeting civilians when engaged in operations in the United States there are rules too. They are similar to the rules of police and other law enforcement.

It is both instructive and chilling to read  "The DoD quietly reissues Directive 5240.01 expanding the use of lethal force against U.S. citizens. "

Quick Summary

  • New provisions: The updated directive expands the circumstances under which the DoD can assist law enforcement, including the use of lethal force.
  • Assassination explicitly forbidden: While assassination is banned, the new language allows for lethal actions under “imminent threats.”
  • Concerns about civil liberties: The expanded definition of “national security threats” is raising alarms, particularly given DHS’s broader definition of domestic terrorism threats.
  • High-level approval required: Any intelligence-sharing that could lead to lethal force must be approved by the Secretary of Defense, but Component Heads can act immediately for up to 72 hours before obtaining approval.

Hegseth should have been asked about his familiarity with this directive and pressured to reveal what he thought about it. He should have been confronted with the possiblity of civilians being mowed down by machine guns only the military are able to use.



It should go without saying that the weapons that the U.S. military can deploy were never meant to be used against civilians whether foreign or domestic. In addition to this, as has been pointed out by others, the military has no training in domestic law enforcement.

  ----------------------------------------













January 17, 2025

Make American Nasty and Mean, by Hal M. Brown


 



There was one line that struck me as particularly telling in The NY Times (subscription) article How Trump’s Border Czar Thomas Homan Found MAGA. It isn't about Homan. Is is about Trump.

The goes beyond Trump saying he admires someone who is tough on policy, which Homan is. Trump was saying he admires him because he sees him as nasty and mean.

Trump's reelection has unleashed the rapid junkyard dog in him. The official photo of Trump for 2025 is very different from the smiling photo if 2017. It has been compared to the mugshot photo that ended up on t-shirts. 

Trump is without a doubt a mean and nasty president. He may not be the meanest and nastiest in modern history. LBJ and Nixon are said to have been foul mouthed in private. Trump has  made a show of his nastiness. 

One core of his personality is malevolence. If he was a king in olden times if some0ne crossed him or merely annoyed his sensibilities they might not even make it to the quillotine. Their heads might role right there in the royal court.  "Clean-up on aisle three."

Trump enters his second term not only as a lame duck. While he may have a fantasy that he can remain in office after his term ends and that he will remain healthy well into his 80's, I think he has to have some desire to enjoy as much revenge as he possibly can while he still has the power to do this. 

There is nothing subtle about Trump wanting to exact revenge of his actual enemies. He doesn't want to make it impossible for them to get elected again. He wants to make them miserable by having them prosecuted and if not imprisoned at least bankrupted. As far as people he has pledged to deport, or to put it bluntly, to get rid of, he wants to rip families apart and destroy the lives of people who have been leading happy productive lives here for years.

We are about to have a souless president for whom the cruelty is the point.

You may have seen the AI image I made a few months ago and used in some blogs. I revised this to show an even darker Trump and some bloodly letters.


  ----------------------------------------



January 16, 2025

You can take the bully out of the schoolyard, but you can't take the bully out of the boy, by Hal M. Brown

 

When Trump finally falls asleep at night he may dream of vanquishing a group of attacking thugs or being in a boxing ring intimidating his opponent with his snarling face and rippling muscles. He may also have dreams about leading a SWAT team raid against undocumented immigrants.


He didn't need to be dreaming when he pretended to beat up Vince McMahan and shave his heard.
You've probably seen the video of Trump knocking Vince McMahon down, sucker punching him, and then shaving his head. Click here to see it again. Here's an article about it.

Here are some screenshots: 

I knew two or three schoolyard bullies in grade school. They literally pushed kids around or even punched them so hard they fell down. This gained them their status as rulers of the playground with their own posse of bully wannabes. 

They were what you'd call tough kids. They weren't among the popular kids, some of whom were athletic and played sports and the bullies didn't mess with them. Others were outgoing and had a clever sense of humor. Some drew other kids to them because of their empathy.

Few of the victims of the bullies fought back because the bullies rarely attacked people they thought could to put up a credible fight.

I don't see the young Trump as having had the personality to be popular with other kids. He was probably egotistical and was driven to prove himself and stand out among his classmates. Not having the disposition or social skills to be popular be turned to bullying.

Accounts of Trump's childhood say he was a bully when he was growing up. 

Trump can't literally beat up or push people to the ground anymore. Still, he wants to do this in other ways. 

Of course he did engage in faking it when he body slammed and sucker punched Vince McMahon and pretended to humilate him by shaving his head. It is worth watching him do this to consider he's about to be president again. His fake fighting meets a deep need in him for being like Bruce Lee taking on and beating multiple opponents at once.


I won't bother posting a collection of his absurdly priced NFT images depicting him as a muscle bound superhero. With him it's been about image and posturing over the past four years using words and intimidation to bend people to his will. 

Trump has revealed his fantasies about how he sees himself. He's old. He's out of shape. He has a lot of unhealthy execss fat. All this is relevant because as president he has effective ways to be a bully without getting down and dirty in a schoolyard fight.

He only wishes he could look like Pete Hegseth. It takes work to have a muscle-bound body like his, or Marjorie Taylor Greene's for that matter. Maybe it's naive on my part to think he'd be less malevolently dangerous if he actually was still reasonably physically fit. To compensate for this he now will be able to take vicarious satisfaction in expressing his cruelty by the deceptively benign sounding term "executive orders."

You can bet that if Trump looked like Putin with his shirt off, you'd have seen photos of him like these of Putin's famous shirtless horseback riding photos.  Still, Putin's physical fitness along with his martial arts expertise (he may or may not have a black belt) has the ability to beat up rivals if he needed to. This hasn't made him less of a ruthless despot, so there's this to consider.

I view Trump as someone whose insecurity is deeply buried in his unconscious. This is what Mary Trump said about him:

The deeper cause is his insecurity. This is a man who knows on an unconscious level that he is absolutely nothing of what he claims to be.” (Reference)

According to reports, by the time Trump was in the military academy he maneged to pull off becoming a bully:

One popular narrative about Donald Trump's early years, though, is that his stern workaholic father essentially rejected him when he was a young boy. When he was just 12 years old, the behavior issues of the boy who would become president prompted his father to send him away to the New York Military Academy in Upstate New York. There, as Trump biographer Michael D'Antonio wrote for Politico last year, the boy would be confronted with "an aggressive and isolate subculture that prized physical toughness and defined manhood in the basest terms" until he graduated and went to college.

By all accounts, Trump excelled in this environment, taking on leadership roles and playing baseball and basketball. Still, the boy he was before he enrolled at the military academy — often described by people who knew him as a bully — closely resembles the man he is today. Except for the fact that, now, Donald Trump arguably wields more power and influence than anyone else in the world as the president of the United States. Reference

Trump became more of a bully when his wealth enabled him to do this. Before he entered politics he bullied his way to becoming a billionaire. "The Art of the Deal" shows some of this. In addition in recommending using hyperbole and deception he reveals how he liked to be aggressive.  Here are examples:

On fighting back: "[W]hen people treat me badly or unfairly or try to take advantage of me, my general attitude, all my life, has been to fight back very hard. The risk is you'll make a bad situation worse, and I certainly don't recommend this approach to everyone. But my experience is that if you're fighting for something you believe in — even if it means alienating some people along the way — things usually work out for the best in the end."

On competing: "I'm the first to admit that I am very competitive and that I'll do nearly anything within legal bounds to win. Sometimes, part of making a deal is denigrating your competition." Reference.

You can see some of this bullying in this collection of clips from The Apprentice.


Like everyone, Trump's personality was shaped by his childhood experiences. Today the country is paying a price for the man whose father never gave him the unconditional love any child needs. I see him as wanting to please his bullying father. What better way to do this than become a bully himself. This backfired as a young child since he was sent away to boarding school when he was 12. 

Here's what Trump biographer Michael D'Antonio wrote:

Fred Trump was a fiercely ambitious man who worked seven days a week and devoted few waking hours to his role as a parent. Although he pushed his son Donald to prevail in every arena—to be a "killer" and a "king"—Fred didn’t actually tell the young man how to achieve this destiny. His way of paying attention to his children was to let them watch him at work. Reference.

This is what he wrote about Trump's bullying:

While Fred Trump was busy scheming and manipulating, his son developed into a bullying and out-of-control little boy. As Donald recalled to me, he loved to fight—“all kinds of fights, even physical”—and the teachers and administrators at the private school he attended in Queens, New York, couldn’t manage him. The situation was quite embarrassing to Donald’s father, who was a major benefactor for the school. In exasperation, he abruptly removed his son from the family home, which was a mansion attended by servants, and handed him over to the New York Military Academy in Upstate New York. Upon arrival, twelve-year-old Donald was put into uniform and assigned a tiny cell-like room. In the days, weeks and years to come he would have to cope with an all-male culture of competition and hierarchy where physical abuse, carried out by the students and the adults who supervised them, was part of the routine.

This is the man who will soon be president. Instead of a schoolyard posse to stroke his ego if he gets his way with his nominations he will have people like Kash Patel, Thomas Homan, and Pete Hegseth there to assist him in his bullying. His has his Congressional sycophants and the oligarchs beholden to him. They will be partners in his bullying.

The Trump we see today is someone whose personality was shaped growing up in dysfunctional family. 

For more about this read "Making the man: to understand Trump, look at his relationship with his dad" from the Guardian.




Update: Compare the 2017 photo of the smiling Trump which was selcted for the official photo with the one selected for 2025. It is similar to the defiant glaring mugshot photo. He seems to be saying like a bully would "mess with me at your own peril."

My version:




Personal story: My own experience with a bully was in eight grade when one of them got me in a bear hug and was squeezing me so hard I could barely breathe. Out of a need to survive, without any forethought, I instinctively kneed him in the groin as hard as I could. He crumbled to the ground in pain curled in a fetal position. A group of the most popular girls saw all this. I discovered from one who was a good friend that they were really impressed. That is until I got so frightened he'd get up and beat the crap out of me and then I started to cry. That ruined my 
chance of being the underestimated Mighty Mouse of the school. Long story short - he never messed around with me again. I only wish I could have restrained my tears.

  ----------------------------------------





January 15, 2025

Hegseth, the disrespectful somatic narcissist, By Hal M. Brown

 






The photo of Pete Hegseth wearing a bathing suit after being in a swim event across the Hudson River is making the rounds on social and regular media. He has a large American flag over his shoulder. In addition to wearing the bathing suit, his displaying the flag is begging for people to pay attention to him. It all says "look at me, I am buff and I am beautiful."

How disrespectful is this? Almost 3,000 people died at this site and he's there in a bathing suit suit.

Consider the public reaction if a buxom Democrat showed up there dressed in a flag version of a bikini.




Hegseth is a somatic narcissist. Here's an article about this.

Excerpt:

A somatic narcissist uses their body and the physical space around them as a way to express their narcissism. 

Their superiority and sense of entitlement come from their perception of their physical self. 

They believe they are more beautiful, stronger, or fitter than others. Flaunting their bodies, flex their muscles, and brag about the number of times people hit on them is typical behavior.

Heres another article: 14 Traits of a Somatic Narcissist

This section seems to apply Hegseth and people like RFK Jr. and Marjorie Taylor Greene who are also somatic narcissists:

One common trait of somatic narcissists is their tendency to boast about their fitness routines. They often highlight their achievements in the gym, emphasizing their physical strength and endurance.

These individuals may frequently share photos and updates about their workouts on social media. This constant broadcasting serves to draw attention to their dedication and physical attributes.

Somatic narcissists might also compare their fitness levels to others, often implying superiority. They take pride in being perceived as more disciplined and fit.

Conversations with these individuals can often be dominated by tales of their exercise regimes, diet plans, and physical feats. Compliments about their fitness are not just welcomed but actively sought.

This behavior reflects their need for admiration and validation through their physical appearance. The need to feel superior physically drives them to continuously seek acknowledgment for their efforts in fitness.

I'd have to know more about Hegseth to see if I thought the following applied to him: 

Somatic narcissists are often known for their superficial charm. They use their physical appearance and charisma to win people over quickly.

Their charm can be captivating, drawing others in easily. This facade helps them mask their true intentions and manipulate those around them.

They often employ compliments and flattery as key tools. This creates an illusion of genuine interest and warmth.

Behind this charming exterior, the primary goal is self-serving. They seek admiration and attention, rather than meaningful connections.

This charm can be particularly effective in social and professional settings. It helps them gain influence and control over others.

Their appearance plays a crucial role here. They invest significant time and effort into maintaining an attractive and impressive look.

Their charm is typically shallow and lacks depth. Once their goals are achieved, their interest in the person often diminishes.

  ----------------------------------------

 

Vomitaurguarion Day will challenge half the country to find something else to do, by Hal M. Brown

  What is happening in Israel may bump some of the coverage of tomorrow's inauguration off non-stop TV coverage. Even if it does, somewh...